Air Sampling for Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds (PAC) in Fire-Damaged Buildings

polycondenced aromatic

Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) are a broad class of combustion by‑products formed when organic materials are exposed to very high temperatures, typically above 900 °C. For air quality specialists and industrial hygienists investigating post‑fire environments, PACs remain one of the most persistent and health‑relevant contaminants. Their toxicological profile is well established: many PACs—particularly the heavier polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)—are mutagenic, carcinogenic, and capable of long‑term deposition on indoor surfaces and settled dust.

Chemistry and Toxicity

Lighter PACs are semi‑volatile, odorous, and generally less hazardous, often recognized by a naphthalene‑type smell. The heavier fraction, however, is non‑volatile, odourless, and significantly more toxic. Compounds such as pyrene, fluorene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, and benzo[a]pyrene are well‑documented carcinogens and are routinely used as indicators of combustion‑related contamination. After a structural fire, these heavier PACs can remain embedded in soot, char, and fine particulates long after visible smoke damage is removed.

Analytical Approach for Post‑Fire Air Investigations

LCS Laboratory applies a PAC screening method adapted from OSHA Method 58 (coal tar pitch volatiles). Air is collected on glass‑fiber filters and analysed using high‑sensitivity fluorescence detection. Under typical sampling conditions (≈200 L), the method achieves a detection capability near 0.0005 mg/m³ for total PACs, making it suitable for post‑fire indoor air assessments where concentrations may be well below occupational limits but still relevant for exposure characterization.

Industrial Benchmarks

Although residential guidelines for PACs are not established, industrial exposure limits provide useful reference points:

  • Asphalt fumes: 0.500 mg/m³
  • Coal tar pitch volatiles: 0.200 mg/m³ (Ontario, 2013)

These benchmarks help contextualize results when evaluating whether fire‑related residues represent a meaningful exposure concern.

Sampling Considerations

  • Equipment: A standard personal sampling pump (e.g., Gilian) with a filter cassette is used.
  • Interferences: Wood dust and certain organic aerosols may fluoresce and elevate readings.
  • Sampling strategy:
    • Collect a background sample in an unaffected area.
    • Sample progressively from lightly to heavily smoke‑impacted zones.
    • Compare gradients to determine the presence and distribution of PAC contamination.

Interpreting Laboratory Findings

  • Results above industrial exposure limits: Indicates significant contamination; remediation and PPE controls are warranted.
  • Results between 1–50% of industrial limits: Suggests residual smoke contamination requiring targeted cleaning.
  • Elevated PACs in damaged vs. clean areas: Confirms fire‑related deposition; removal of settled dust and additional cleaning is recommended.
  • Comparable results between damaged and clean areas: No meaningful PAC contamination detected.

Contact for Project Support

If you are conducting a post‑fire air quality investigation and require sensitive PAC analysis, LCS Laboratory can support your assessment. Contact the laboratory to discuss sampling plans, analytical requirements, or to request a formal quotation. ©

Share this article:
LSC Laboratory Related Pages:
Our News:
LCS Laboratory Blog Categories: